Monthly Archives: December 2022

LATEST CONTRACT NEGOTIATIONS REPORTS

Dec. 15 & 16 Negotiations Sessions

Summary:

The District presented their first counterproposals on compensation and benefits at negotiations last Thursday and Friday. The District is proposing raises of 5%, 3%, and 3% for all faculty over the 3 years covered by the contract, with an extra half-percent per year for instructional adjuncts. The 2022-2023 raise of 5% that the District is proposing falls well below the inflation rate for 2022, meaning that it is effectively a pay cut. Furthermore, the extra half-percent the District is proposing for instructional adjuncts does very little to close the parity gap between instructional adjuncts and their full-time counterparts or to allow the District to reach its parity goal of 85%. Non-instructional adjuncts (including counselors and librarians) are already at or above the 85% threshold, but instructional adjuncts still make on average only about 75% of what full-timers make per class.

AFT responded to the District by proposing that all faculty receive raises of 10%, 8%, and 8%, while instructional adjuncts receive total raises of 17%, 15%, and any additional raise needed to reach the 85% goal in the third year of the contract.

AFT is also proposing increases in employer healthcare contributions sufficient to make the Kaiser single, two-party, and family plans free to full-timers. Finally, AFT continues to propose  quality, affordable District healthcare coverage for part-timers working at least 40% in SMCCCD, with an expanded reimbursement program for part-timers working at least 40% between multiple community college districts.

READ FULL REPORT HERE  (Reports on previous negotiating sessions are on the same page.)

 

Nov. 21 Negotiations Session

Summary: AFT hoped to receive a compensation proposal from the District today, but the District did not come ready to offer one. Instead, they presented an estimate indicating that offering part-timers medical coverage through District plans would cost $20 million—an order of magnitude greater than AFT’s estimate. The District later revealed that their estimate was based on providing coverage for 1296 part-timers—more than double the 505 part-timers currently working in the District, and 5 times the number of part-timers who would have been eligible to choose District-provided healthplans based on their load in SMCCCD this past fall. The District continues to reject AFT’s language giving all faculty the right to work a certain percentage of their hours remotely, as well as language specifying that off-campus worksites shall be assigned only with the consent of faculty.

READ FULL REPORT HERE  (Reports on previous negotiating sessions are on the same page.)

 

Nov. 2 Negotiations Session

Summary: Contract negotiations continue to stall due to the District’s lack of movement and unwillingness to work collaboratively towards agreement. At today’s negotiations sessions, the first since September 20, the District failed to provide a counter to our proposal on part-time healthcare. They also rejected our proposal to increase Professional Development funding (Article 13), and proposed multiple takebacks on Transfers and Reassignments (Article 12). The District reminded us that 8 articles are now in the “parking lot” due to our inability to make progress towards agreement. For 7 of these 8 articles, the District has repeatedly expressed their unwillingness to move from the status quo.

READ FULL REPORT HERE  (Reports on previous negotiating sessions are on the same page.)

 

Sep. 20 Faculty Contract Negotiations Session Report

Summary: AFT and the District came to an agreement on a Fall 2022 MOU on the effects of the District’s change in masking requirements. This MOU includes provisions for accommodations for faculty who are immunocompromised, live in a household with an immunocompromised person, or have a very young child. It also sets forth a process for faculty and deans to decide how to cover instruction if a faculty member is required to isolate due to Covid, or must care for someone who is isolating.

AFT and the District also continued negotiating over our multiyear contract, with AFT presenting proposals on part-time healthcare, hours of employment (including remote work arrangements), and professional development funding, among other issues.

READ FULL REPORT HERE  (Reports on previous negotiating sessions are on the same page.)

 

Sep. 2 Faculty Contract Negotiations Session Report

Summary: After refusing to even negotiate over an MOU at our last bargaining session, the District opened this session with a proposal to continue the provisions of the MOU from Summer 2022. AFT offered a counter, but the District would not agree to several of our proposals, and discussions on the Fall 2022 MOU will continue at our next session. The parties also discussed contract articles on union rights and part-time seniority.

READ FULL REPORT HERE  (Reports on previous negotiating sessions are on the same page.)

 

Aug. 24th Faculty Contract Negotiations Session Report

Summary: This past Thursday, AFT negotiators put forward an MOU for Fall 2022 that gives faculty the support we need for a successful return to on-campus instruction. Unfortunately, the District’s representatives refused to even negotiate over our proposals, claiming that we are back to status quo and no longer need an MOU. In addition, the District refused to show any movement on our proposals for a month of fully paid parental leave, stronger reappointment rights for part-timers, and a clear timeline and process for faculty with disabilities to obtain reasonable accommodations. These proposals aim to allow faculty to better support our students, and we are disappointed that the District is currently refusing to work towards an agreement on them.

READ FULL REPORT HERE  (Reports on previous negotiating sessions are on the same page.)

 

Aug. 3rd Faculty Contract Negotiations Session Report

Summary: On August 3rd AFT and the District continued to negotiate over AFT’s proposals for paid parental leave beyond that currently guaranteed by Ed Code, and for strengthening part-timer reappointment rights as set forth in Article 19 of our multiyear contract. The parties also discussed new articles proposed by AFT on disability accommodations and course scheduling for full-timers.

READ FULL REPORT HERE  (Reports on previous negotiating sessions are on the same page.)

 

July 28th Faculty Contract Negotiations Session Report

Summary: On July 28th AFT and the District negotiated over a number of contract articles, including Articles 7 (Hours of Employment), 11 (Leaves), and 19 (Part-Time Employment), as well as new articles AFT has proposed that cover class assignment for full-timers and disability accommodations for all faculty. Unfortunately, the District has continued to reject AFT’s proposals for a month of fully paid parental leave, stronger part-time reappointment protections, and the right for both instructional and non-instructional faculty to work a specified percentage of their hours remotely. The District also continues to reject AFT’s proposals for a clear timeline and process for disability accommodation, though they have shown some movement on our proposal for a consistent set of procedures for assigning classes to full-timers.

READ FULL REPORT HERE  (Reports on previous negotiating sessions are on the same page.)

Want to help keep your colleagues informed about actions they can take to help us win–and maybe help plan some of those actions? Join our Contract Action Team by emailing AFT 1493 Executive Secretary Marianne Kaletzky at kaletzky@aft1493.org to let us know you’re interested. Together we can make the changes faculty and students need!

 

December 2022 (Issue 46, Num. 3)

In this issue:

 

 

 

December 2022 Advocate: Faculty Focus: Meet Danny Lynch

Faculty Focus

Meet Danny Lynch, new Promise counselor at Cañada College

Interview conducted by Katharine Harer, AFT 1493 Co-Vice President & Outreach Organizer


Danny Lynch (front) with his Cuesta College students at the UCSB EOPS Summer Institute

Tell us about some of the work you’ve done before coming to our district? 

It was quite a circuitous journey before landing in the SMCCD. After undergrad I was pretty lost in terms of what to do with my life and tried a lot of paths. During this time, I worked in the service industry, surf shops, drove town cars to the airport, and was part of a non-profit that sold coffee at the farmers market to support environmental and social justice projects in Nicaragua. I eventually went to South America for a year and taught English with the United Nations Development Program. In the end,  it was this experience that made it clear to me that I wanted a career that would allow me to serve others. At first, I thought I would do this through medicine. After being back at community college for a couple years doing prerequisites for PA [physician’s assistant] school, I found myself guiding my fellow students and helping them with resources. Being a community college and transfer student myself, I found that my story and the tools I picked up along the way were very helpful when applied to helping other students reach their goals. I enjoyed working in free clinics and saw a lot of potential to help communities through preventive medicine, but I knew working at a community college was what I really wanted to do deep down.

In graduate school I was involved in gender-based violence education and prevention, advising and providing accommodations at the DRC, Career Counseling and working as a counseling intern at Alan Hancock Community College. Upon graduation I got a part-time counseling position at Cuesta college. I was there for 5 years and worked as a counselor in EOPS, Pre-Health/Nursing and the Dream Center. I was really happy at Cuesta working as a part-time counselor but I also had a long-term goal of eventually joining this district. I am very happy and grateful to be here!

What drew you to becoming a community college counselor?

I touched on it a little bit in the first question but my own experience as a community college student drew me to becoming a community college counselor. I wasn’t able to fully participate and take advantage of high school because of life circumstances and community college gave me another opportunity at education. It provided me a path to a college degree as well as graduate school. I experienced first-hand how transformative community can be, and this really drew me in and made me want to be part of the family.

“I do see it as one of the greatest, equitable systems and tools we have to make immense changes in the lives of individuals from all backgrounds. There is a lot of work to still do, but it’s a pretty magical place. It provides so much opportunity to work for social justice and make a long-lasting impact.”

 

Of course, it’s not perfect and many barriers still exist in the institution, but at the heart of it, I do see it as one of the greatest, equitable systems and tools we have to make immense changes in the lives of individuals from all backgrounds. There is a lot of work to still do, but it’s a pretty magical place. It provides so much opportunity to work for social justice and make a long-lasting impact

I also love believing in people, encouraging and being there for them and most of all, connecting them with the resources they need to get to where they want to go. Being a community college counselor lets me do all these things and have the privilege to be part of someone’s journey and story. It’s special and I never take it for granted. I have the best job in the world.

From talking to you, I could tell you have an understanding of “non-traditional” students.  How did you learn this?

My own my path and sensitivity have led me to be curious about the stories of others. When you are curious about others and seek to understand their lives and how they experience — or move through — this world, you see quickly that we don’t live in a meritocracy. You see massive social stratification that creates all kinds of barriers and inequities. This awareness, among other personal experiences, helps me understand many of my students and the path they’re on. That doesn’t mean I know how it feels to be them, but it gives me an understanding of their world, which allows me to serve them.

What do you like the best about your job as a Promise Counselor at Cañada?

I have only been here for a semester but my answer will be the same 4 years from now: working with my students. They’re the real MVPs. They inspire and energize me so, so much.  I know you shouldn’t depend on others for your happiness, but my students, and watching them on their journeys, make me genuinely happy.

I also have really been enjoying meeting the staff and faculty here. I am looking forward to building more relationships and connections. It is really important for me to create a family wherever I am, so hopefully we can do that.

What do you find frustrating or challenging about your job?

If I am being truly transparent, it would be that so many classes are online. By no means am I suggesting we shouldn’t have online classes or a hybrid work policy. With that said, the pendulum has swung too far towards online modalities and this is a challenge when I am trying to find in-person courses for students. Many of my students are coming back after a semester of only-online and wanting only in-person classes and there are very few options. They are really disappointed when I have nothing to offer them, and it’s frustrating as a counselor not being able to help provide your student with what they need to be successful. Not only have students expressed learning better in-person, but they are really missing that social aspect. They want to engage with their peers. They want to make friends and connect with their professors and counselors. They want to have a college experience, and when the majority of classes are online, we are depriving many students from this.  I am not trying to take anyone’s hybrid schedule away or demand we be in person 100 percent. We really need to look at how we are interpreting the data and be honest with ourselves in terms of why we want to be online and why we’re advocating to work from home.

Can you share one or two anecdotes about recent students? (without names or identifying info, of course!)

Sure, a really easy one would be a STEM student I have who was failing all of his classes after the first seven weeks of the semester. They were having a lot of trouble getting motivated, managing time and overall having trouble adjusting to the demands of college. I worked really closely with this student throughout the semester addressing the above issues, but most of all letting them know I would always be there to support them as long as they showed up. I was also able to do several warm handoffs with them. I brought them up to the Learning/STEM center and introduced them to the people there. I also introduced them to one of our amazing retention specialists, Gonzalo, who was super helpful. It wasn’t an immediate change, but over the semester they started spending more and more time in the Learning Center and developing their study skills. Yesterday they just dropped by to check-in and make sure they were good to go for next semester. I asked if they were passing all of their classes and they said yes — and to that I said, “Yeah, you are good to go and you’ll be able to move on to the next courses in the sequence that we have in your plan.”  This is quite a common story, but I tell it because it shows the importance of showing up for the student beyond the Student Educational Plan.

When you’re not working, how do you like to spend your free time?

Dabbling in art projects, surfing, exploring nature, eating and eating again, walking through cities, trying to listen more and just trying to be a less selfish human — but it’s hard!


Danny catching a wave

Anything else you’d like to add?

If you read this, thank you for being interested in me. I would like to learn about you. If you want to connect with me, I would love to collaborate, be mentored/learn from you, or just meet a new friend. I guess, lastly, I am genuinely honored to have this opportunity to work as a counselor. I consider it a privilege and I absolutely love it.

 

 

December 2022 Advocate: AFT & CSEA leaders speak out

Contract Negotiations

AFT and CSEA leaders call on Trustees to push District bargaining team to present reasonable salary and benefits proposals

At the December 14th SMCCCD Board of Trustees meeting, AFT 1493 President Monica Malamud and AFT 1493 Co-Vice President and Chief Negotiator Joaquin Rivera spoke, once again, about their frustrations with the lack of movement from the District bargaining team and called on the Trustees to urge district negotiators “ensure that the district’s negotiating team and district staff are prepared for negotiations, and treat our team respectfully.” Watch their presentations below:

Click here to or read the text of Monica and Joaquin’s presentations.

 

Text of Monica and Joaquin’s presentations

Good evening.  My name is Monica Malamud.  I’m the president of AFT local 1493 and a member of our negotiation team.

As our negotiations don’t show any movement on non-economic proposals, since they’re basically in the parking lot, our faculty are growing increasingly impatient with the silence from the District’s negotiating team regarding economic matters, both salary and benefits.

We were hoping to get a compensation proposal from the District at our last negotiation session on November 21, but instead, what we got was simply a presentation by Richard Storti in which he stated that we’re in a volatile economic situation due to decreasing home sales, which could impact the District’s revenue from property taxes, and potential rising unemployment, which could impact the small portion of revenue the District receives from sale and use tax.  Still, a smaller number of home sales does not directly imply that the district’s revenue from property taxes will decrease.  In fact, San Mateo County’s property tax assessment is already around 4% above last year’s assessment, even though we’re not even halfway into the fiscal year, indicating that we can expect a substantial increase in property tax revenue by the end of the year.  Additionally, Storti himself said several times that “The District is in a very strong financial position.”

Considering the District’s strong financial position and the very high inflation that we have been experiencing, and the fact that San Mateo county is a very expensive place to live in, we are looking forward to a fair compensation proposal from our District at our negotiation session tomorrow.

Also regarding salaries, we expect the District to make a significant contribution towards closing the pay parity gap for part-time faculty.  As a reminder of the District’s commitment, I will read article 8.15.D from our contract:

“The District acknowledges that parity is not an abstract concept, but a clear goal that it is contractually obligated to achieve. To that end, the District further acknowledges that parity cannot be achieved without the district allocating funds to adjunct compensation over and above faculty raises. The district therefore commits to dedicating additional funding for instructional adjunct salary increases above and beyond salary increases for all faculty until parity is achieved.”

Good evening, I am Joaquin Rivera, AFT Local 1493 Co-Vice president and Chief Negotiator

With regards to health benefits, we’re waiting for the District’s response to our proposal on medical caps for full-time faculty, as well on a response to our proposal for part-time healthcare benefits, which we presented almost three months ago.  I would like to remind you that the California budget includes over $200Mill dedicated to part-time healthcare benefits, and districts which offer its part-timers quality, affordable plans are eligible to be reimbursed for up to 100% for the cost of these plans.

At the last negotiation session 3 weeks ago, the district stated that the cost of offering healthcare to part-timers was very high.  The District’s Chief Negotiator said that the cost was $20 Mill.  We asked the negotiating team how they had arrived at this cost estimate, and since they could not provide the answer themselves, Bernata Slater and Peter Fitzsimmons were invited to provide the rationale for this estimate.  I’m not going to go into all the details because it would take too long, so let me give you just one example:  the district’s estimate assumed that part-time health care was offered to 1296 part-time faculty. Is that a reasonable estimate?  Not at all.  When did our district have 1296 part-timers?  Never. The district knows how many part-timers it currently employs. How many?  Currently 505.  So the number of part-timers that the District used to estimate their health care costs is over 2.5 times the current number of part-timers.  It’s also over 5 times the number of part-timers who would have been eligible to choose District-provided health plans based on having a load of at least 40% of FTE in SMCCCD this fall.  Did the District Chief Negotiator and district staff think that we would not catch on their outrageous assumptions?  Does this district think that faculty are dumb?  How can we, or you, believe any of the numbers the District presents after this fiasco?

Things have not improved since the last time I was here in front of you.

I’m imploring the Board to do everything in your power to ensure that the district’s negotiating team and district staff are prepared for negotiations, and treat our team respectfully.  Thank you.

December 2022 Advocate: Why we deserve a fair contract

Contract Campaign

AFT and CSEA members speak out to the Board about why faculty and staff deserve fair contracts

To try to help communicate AFT and CSEA members’ experiences and feelings about the current contract negotiations, union members submitted personal comments explaining why they deserve fair contracts. Many of these comments were read at the December 14th SMCCCD Board of Trustees meeting,.

Watch Skyline College Biology Professor Nick Kapp and CSM Ethnic Studies Professor Malathi Iyengar read AFT members’ comments about why faculty deserve a fair contract.

Watch several CSEA members read members’ comments about why classified staff deserve a fair contract.