Monthly Archives: May 2022

May 2022 Advocate: Film Studies instructor’s new documentary

Recognizing faculty achievements

Announcing “Clarissa’s Battle,” a new documentary film directed by SMCCD Film Studies instructor Tamara Perkins

Film studies instructor and filmmaker Tamara Perkins has directed and produced another new documentary, Clarissa’s Battle, which follows a local organizer and single mom leading a movement for childcare and early education for all. “Clarissa is a driven, straight-talking single Black mother and social warrior in Oakland, California. Becoming unhoused with an infant inspired her to champion childcare and preschool as a human right.” The film trailer and additional details can be found here: www.clarissasbattle.com.

The film premieres at Lincoln Center in New York City on May 21 and 22, also available digitally beginning May 19, and will also be screened at SF Doc Fest on June 4.

Tamara is AFT 1493’s new Part-Timer Representative for the College of San Mateo, where in addition to Skyline College, she teaches film. A huge congratulations to Tamara on her new film and her social justice work in raising awareness of how marginalized Bay Area parents and workers can fight to improve their lives.

If you have questions, feel free to contact Tamara. You can send her a note at <perkinst@smccd.edu>.

 

May 2022 Advocate: Teach-In on District budget

Understanding our district’s budget

AFT 1493 Teach-In exposes truths about District’s inequitable budget decisions

By Cat Stoehr, AFT 1493 Student Intern, & Katharine Harer, AFT 1493 Co-Vice President

Nearly 70 students and faculty members participated in a teach-in organized by AFT 1493: From Austerity to Prosperity: The Politics of Funding Education in SMCCD – Students, Staff & Faculty Unite to Re-imagine Educational Equity on Thursday, May 12th.

The teach-in, specifically focused on the power and influence of funding decisions on our education, was initially brought to the union’s Contract Action Team (CAT) at the beginning of the spring semester by AFT 1493 student interns and Skyline students, Cat Stoehr & Shannon Hoang. They recognized that many students move through the education system without ever being truly exposed to the underlying structural issues that shape their experience, as well as the experience of faculty, staff and campus community members. Cat and Shannon’s vision of the teach-in was to create a space that would foster greater curiosity and awareness about how the seemingly abstract issue of budgeting and dispersion of resources creates very real material impacts on our collective experience in the SMCCD community. As the union was preparing to enter negotiations for a new multi-year contract, CAT members saw the teach-in as an exciting way to inform faculty and students about the inequities in the district’s distribution of funds and build long-term engagement and faculty-student activism. [Watch video of Cat Stoehr & Shannon Hoang’s introductory remarks.]

The lively and engaged audience was treated to short remarks by local elected officials, faculty members and students who spoke on the various ways that budget decisions contribute to inequity in our college district, as well as sharing how we, both on an individual and collective level, can begin to affect systemic change. After the speakers, participants had an opportunity to collectively imagine exactly what a budget that prioritizes the well-being of students and faculty could look like, and how our district could move from austerity to prosperity for all.

The first speaker of the day, Dr. Rod Daus-Magbual, adjunct Ethnic Studies instructor at Skyline and the mayor of Daly City, eloquently summed up the importance of envisioning budget decisions that better reflect our priorities: “I hope this teach-in will push our imagination [to] reflect higher education that advocates for student and teacher wellness, a sense of security, purpose and hope. Budgets reflect our values. It’s challenging but not impossible.” [Watch video of Dr. Rod Daus-Magbual’s presentation.]

The next speaker, James Coleman, current South San Francisco City Council Member and candidate for California State Assembly representing District 21, spoke to how state-level policies, especially measures such as Proposition 13 that allow for the ultra-wealthy to avoid paying their fair share of taxes, directly impact inequity in education and in our communities. He shared some progressive solutions, including a wealth tax currently being proposed in the California Legislature (AB 2289) that would, “place a modest wealth tax on those with assets of $50 million-plus.”  According to Coleman, this bill could, “generate over $22 billion in revenue every year and this could be used to increase public education spending […] but also address homelessness [and] affordable housing.”  The wealth tax would be paid by less than 1% of Californians. [Watch video of James Coleman’s presentation.]

Oliver Tinoco, a Skyline student transferring to SF State who is a fierce advocate and ally for LGBTQ+ and undocumented student issues on campus, spoke on how administrative decisions on how  to spend money often leave the most vulnerable students behind. He shared how he was prevented from taking a Latine literature class he had enrolled in because the class had been canceled only weeks before the semester began, reflecting a larger pattern of the administration canceling classes, often at the very last-minute, and in this case after fall registration was over.  Often the classes that are canceled are the ones that serve marginalized communities, like Latine and LGBTQ+ students.  He referenced how this pattern of canceling classes also contributed to Skyline’s failure to achieve its status as a “Hispanic Serving Institution”, partly because it did not hire enough Latine faculty and staff, and also because it did not provide classes that serve the Latine community, which make up 30% of the Skyline student population. Tinoco pointed out the hypocrisy in institutions that attempt to use language of equity, while not actually following through with actions: “I started feeling frustrated and honestly, more than anything, disappointed that they’re able to collect so much funding and resources but completely fail at pouring it back in directly to the campus and to the programs and students that need it the most.” [Watch video of Oliver Tinoco’s presentation.]

Jessica Silver-Sharp, adjunct librarian at Skyline and Cañada Colleges, pointed out the personal impacts that wage and benefit inequity have on the livelihoods of our part-time faculty, who make up nearly 60% of SMCCD instructors and 80% of community college faculty statewide. She spoke to just how tenuous the experience of part-timers is in SMCCD, such as the requirement to teach a 40% load to be able to qualify for the healthcare reimbursement, even though part time faculty have no control over whether their classes are canceled. Silver-Sharp commented: “It should be obvious to our administration that sick, stressed-out teachers cannot perform as well as healthy ones and that we cannot support our students as well if we’re struggling ourselves. She added, “And while our district has the financial means to correct these budget inequities, it’s by choice that they don’t prioritize part-time teachers.” [Watch video of Jessica Silver-Sharp’s presentation.]

Doniella Maher, full-time Cañada College English instructor and an organizer for the ballot initiative: Early Care and Education for All in South San Francisco, wove together facets of how funding inequity often widens the already existing gaps in pay and treatment of those who experience race, gender and class discrimination. She presented how caring labor, which is work that includes teaching and childcare and that is often undertaken by women, particularly women of color and working-class people, is essential to our community, but also systematically devalued in a “broader movement of deprofessionalization.”  Maher stated: “The reality of sexism and racism in our society is that caring labor, which disportionately includes women, and often women of color, is paid less than other work that requires similar levels of education and experience. And two-tiered systems within caring labor means that a sector of that workforce makes even less than the already low wages associated with those kinds of jobs”. She also spoke to the importance of early childhood care and education as essential to allow parents to hold their jobs, underlining how inequitable salaries across multiple levels of education have the most impact on those who are already vulnerable. [Watch video of Doniella Maher’s presentation.]

Throughout the event, the student participants asked questions in the chat and shared the connections they were making between the information presented and their own knowledge of faculty struggles and commented on their own experiences at our colleges. They registered their shock about the unfair two-tier system in our district: the fact that part-time faculty are paid less than full time, lack job security and aren’t provided with a full program of health benefits but, instead, a reimbursement stipend. Students were also enraged to find out that the district offers no paid parental leave for faculty members.

After the speakers, the event transitioned to an interactive activity, led by Tim Rottenberg, adjunct Skyline Middle College instructor, in which participants created a “People’s Budget,” a budget that reflects the priorities of our SMCCD community. Participants suggested areas where we believe there should be both increased spending on community needs and decreased spending on areas that don’t clearly benefit teachers, staff and students.

Some suggestions for how a more just budget could better reflect the needs of the community were to increase spending on healthcare for part time faculty; provide more women’s/gender/ethnic studies classes, smaller classes in general and more tutoring services; offer healthier and more varied food options on campus; and provide more transit connectivity.

Then when it came to areas where our district could decrease spending, the suggestions from the participants included: cut back on the numbers of district administrators and reduce high administrator salaries; deprioritize unnecessary and ineffective marketing ventures; avoid funding construction projects that produce buildings that don’t meet student and faculty needs; stop contracting out work that can be done in-house; and be more intentional about spending on classroom resources.

The words of Skyline student, Oliver Tinoco, powerfully describe the outlook of many students and faculty:  “You cannot exist on a campus championing diversity and inclusivity that then fails to uphold those two pillars on a day to day basis […] Ultimately it just creates the sort of environment where […] students are starting to feel as though the school that supposedly embraces us and champions celebrating their students is doing it all in vain. It is at its most basic, and most simple, a matter of putting your money where your mouth is”

We closed the event by announcing the formation of a Student Action Committee to provide a space for students to organize and advocate for change alongside faculty members.  Please reach out to union organizers, Rika Fabian – fabian@aft1493.org or Katharine Harer – harer@aft1493.org to get involved!

May 2022 Advocate: Negotiations Report

Negotiations Report

AFT and District negotiating teams hold first bargaining session for 2022-25 faculty contract

by Marianne Kaletzky, AFT 1493 Executive Secretary

On May 4, AFT and the District held our first negotiation session towards a faculty contract that will cover July 2022 through June 2025.

AFT negotiators attending were Joaquín Rivera (Chief Negotiator), Monica Malamud, and Marianne Kaletzky; AFT members observing were Eric Brenner, Lorraine DeMello, Mandy Lucas, and Lori Slicton. District negotiators in attendance were Randy Erickson (Chief Negotiator), Joe Morello, David Feune, Aaron McVean, Mitch Bailey, and Max Hartman.

The District introduced their new chief negotiator, Randy Erickson of the Erickson Law Firm in San Diego. Erickson and his team presented proposed revisions to Articles 2, 3, and 10 of the current faculty contract.

  • Article 2: Organizational Rights (governs the rights of the union to speak with faculty and access information about faculty, as well as provisions like release time for union activities):
    • The District is proposing transitioning from sharing information about faculty with AFT through email to sharing it through a secure website.
    • The District is proposing language governing new employee orientations and AFT’s role in those orientations, including that AFT will be provided with notice of an orientation at least 10 days in advance where feasible, and that AFT will be provided 30 minutes to speak with new faculty at group orientations.
    • The District rejected our proposal to increase release units available for union activities from 18 per semester to 24 per semester.
  • Article 3: Payroll Deductions for Union Dues
    • The District is proposing language stating that membership and dues deductions are managed internally by the local, rather than by the District, and that the local is liable for charges brought against the District related to dues deductions where the District has relied on information provided by the local. The District’s proposal would not change the percentage deducted for dues or the process for becoming an AFT 1493 member.
  • Article 10: Retirement
    • The District is proposing removing language setting forth conditions for participation in the Reduced Workload Plan (also known as the Phase-In Retirement Plan). According to the District, because the conditions for participating in the Reduced Workload Plan are dictated by CalSTRS, having language on specific conditions in the contract might create a divergence between the CalSTRS conditions and the contract conditions and could make faculty confused as to whether they are entitled to participate in the plan. The District also proposed minor linguistic and grammatical changes to Article 10.

AFT will respond to the District’s proposals at our next negotiation session on May 20.

After the District presented their proposals, AFT presented all proposals contained in our sunshine document (termed as such because these proposals must be shared with the public, or “sunshined,” before negotiations begin). Those proposals include:

  • A fairer salary formula than the one that gave us a .52% raise for this year
  • Clear policies around class cancellations
  • Paid parental leave
  • Increased District contribution to full-time health benefits
  • Part-time pay parity (pay PT faculty at least 85% of what FT faculty make for the same amount of work)
  • Better healthcare options for part-timers
  • Guarantee that faculty can do a certain percentage of work remotely
  • Increased flexibility for counselors and the recognition of online counseling as a modality of counseling
  • Stronger part-timer appointment rights
  • Clear, expedient disability accommodation process
  • Contractual protection for academic freedom
  • Contractual provisions covering distance education
  • Clear policies on when faculty may be assigned to teach dual enrollment classes

 

Read more information on our proposals

View the full sunshine document (AFT’s complete initial contract proposals)

• All negotiations reports are posted on our Negotiations Updates page

 

We look forward to sharing more information with you as the District responds to specific proposals and we begin in-depth negotiation on them.

Upcoming negotiations dates:

  • Thursday, May 19: 12-4 p.m.

May 2022 Advocate: AFT 1493ers at May Day Parade

AFT 1493 members march in SF May Day – International Workers’ Day parade

On Sunday, May 1, AFT 1493 members—from left to right, Rika Yonemura-Fabian (Skyline), Elinor Westfold (CSM), Kolo Wamba (Skyline), Eric Brenner (Skyline), Katharine Harer (Skyline) and Evan Kaiser (CSM) — marched with thousands of union workers from around the Bay Area in San Francisco’s May Day – International Workers’ Day Parade. They marched aside the AFT 2121/CCSF contingent to show support for the fight against impending faculty layoffs at City College. The march was sponsored by several Bay Area labor councils.

May 2022 Advocate: Why we are piloting the workload point system

Workload program

What’s up with this workload point system?

by Michael Hoffman, AFT 1493 Cañada Co Chapter-Chair (with input from the AFT 1493 Executive Committee)

[Related: Read Workload point System FAQs]

This note is addressed specifically to my full-time colleagues across the district because the program we will discuss here does not apply to part-time faculty although many will find it a relevant discussion.

Before I get into some details, I want you to first imagine all the meetings, mentorship of colleagues and students, faculty evaluations, program reviews, course outline of record revisions, SLO assessments, and all the other things that you do in your job which are not directly related to your courses, counseling assignments, or library work. Can you make a list? Try.

The recent introduction of a pilot workload point system has prompted some confusion and concern on the part of faculty. It’s important that faculty understand (or remember) the origins and intention of this system. My overriding message to you is that this should be seen as a tool for faculty to QUANTIFY and LIMIT the amount of work we do OR argue for increased compensation.

Here are some important facts to know about this pilot points system:

1st: This came from faculty, lots of them, not the district. The point system is the result of years of concern and discussion about the steadily increasing workload of faculty members. From shared-governance committee meetings and hiring committees to SLOs to statewide initiatives, the sphere of work that is expected from faculty has grown steadily. The point system is the first attempt to quantify all the work that faculty do which is not directly related to their primary duty (such as teaching classes, counseling students, or providing librarian services) and that would otherwise go unrecorded, unaccounted for, and uncompensated. This replaces a system where any work that could be described on the Appendix D list would be just “part of your load” regardless of whatever else you were already doing.

2nd: This is a program meant to help faculty limit their workload. In the research leading up to this proposal it became clear that most faculty already do much more than “6 points” worth of work. Thus, our expectation is that the overall workload for most faculty should decrease under this plan. Faculty should not be taking on unlimited amounts of work! During a joint taskforce on workload in 2018, a survey was conducted among faculty. The results even convinced then-Executive Vice Chancellor Kathy Blackwood to exclaim, “Wow, faculty really are doing a lot of work outside the classroom?”

3rd: The point system can be used to increase faculty’s collective strength, but that also means we have to sort some things out and actually talk to each other. You are not just an individual worker dealing directly with your supervisor/Dean on your own. Firstly, if you are concerned about not having enough points, or being pressured to do more, the best place to turn is your department or division colleagues.
If you are in a department with multiple faculty, we highly recommend you work out a division of labor with your colleagues, then present that to the Dean.
– If you are a one-person department, you should consult with others who are one-person departments on your campus or across the district. Faculty who are the only full-timer in their department can claim the points for department lead. However, you should try and document all the things you do beyond your core duties (such as teaching or counseling) and attempt to quantify these activities in terms of points. We expect many of the single-person departments will have grounds to argue for additional resources.
– If you already get release time for things you’re doing, you can’t claim points as well, but you need to clarify exactly what the expected duties are for your reassigned time.

4th: The point system should allow you to say NO. This may seem obvious, but to reduce your workload you have to actually NOT do things. Withholding one’s labor is a fundamental right and an important part of maintaining your own health. Because we are professionals and we have some control over the boundaries we set on our work, it is our responsibility to set our priorities and balance those with our obligations. The points system gives us a tool to draw clear limits around those things.

5th: You’re not Alone! If you’re wondering how to account for your points, and you’re feeling confused or stressed about it, please reach out to close colleagues in your department or division and then to your union representatives if there are still questions. If a conflict arises with a Dean regarding your allocation of workload points, the matter will be passed up to a workload pilot review committee comprised of Steve Lehigh (AFT rep), Kate Browne (Academic Senate rep), Aaron McVean (Vice Chancellor of Educational Services and Planning)and David Feune (Director of Human Resources).

6th: You can help us shape how this system is implemented! Since this is a pilot, we will be monitoring the ways this does or does not work and trying to refine it. Before the pilot program sunsets, we expect to renegotiate this specific point-system and incorporate all that we learn during this pilot period.