Monthly Archives: May 2022

May 2022 Advocate: Workload Pilot Project FAQs

Workload program

Workload Pilot Project FAQs

[Related: Read “Why we are piloting the workload point system”]

WHAT is the workload pilot project & why do we have it?

Full-time workload has increased unsustainably over the last decade, with no accounting for the time spent on hiring, evaluations, committee work, etc., leading to faculty burnout and demoralization. Over the years, our faculty union attempted to address this issue during contract negotiations. During our last bargaining cycle, AFT proposed a pilot project to quantify full-time faculty workload, with the goal of setting reasonable limits, and both the district and AFT signed off on it. Because it is new and a pilot, there will be areas that are incomplete or confusing. We hope this FAQ will help.

WHICH academic years does the 2-year workload pilot project cover?

Academic years 2022-23 & 2023-24.

WHERE can I read the specific contract language describing this project?

See Article 6.5. Workload Pilot Project, which starts at the bottom of the linked page. It’s a short read: less than two pages of narrative, followed by a list of activities and the points assigned to each activity. Points required of counselors are in Article 7.6, for librarians in Article 7.7, and for nurses and faculty assigned to other duties in Article 7.8.

WHAT do full time faculty members need to do to participate?

As stated in Article 6.5 of our contract, faculty must submit a professional plan in May for the following academic year, showing which activities you plan to carry out during the upcoming year. A table on pages 13-14 of the contract lists the points associated with different activities.

WHEN do we have to submit the professional responsibilities plan?

By the end of May.

HOW many points should a faculty member plan to do during an academic year?

Instructional faculty need to do 6-7 points (Article 6.5), counselors need to do 5 points (Article 7.6), and librarians need to do 4 points (Article 7.7). Nurses, instructional designers, and faculty coordinators do not need to do any points and are not required to complete a professional responsibilities plan (Article 7.8).

IF an activity is not included on the list, does it have a default point value of 0.5?

No!

WHAT if an activity we plan to pursue isn’t included on the list?

The faculty member and supervisor may jointly include items that are not on this list, add them to one of the tiers, and assign points to the activity.

WHO can we contact if we have an issue, such as a disagreement with my dean?

An overview committee has been set up to help with any issues that arise. The committee is made up of one rep from AFT (Steve Lehigh), DAS president (Kate Browne), and Aaron McVean and David Feune from district administration. Faculty members can contact Steven Lehigh at lehigh@aft1493.org.

IS the Formstack that the district created and that some deans are distributing to faculty required?

No, this form is not required. Faculty may find it useful, but it is not a requirement to use it. You can write up your plan and submit it to your dean without the form. Note: the form-stack has been found to incorrectly restrict or interpret the implementation of the pilot program.

WHERE can we get the Formstack?

https://smccd-czqfp.formstack.com/workflows/faculty_professional_responsibilities_form?sso=6234b8dfe3544
(Note: as of the morning of 4/27, the Formstack appears to be down, perhaps temporarily.)

ARE the activities a faculty member lists on their plan only accepted if your Dean approves?

The plan must be approved by the Dean, unless a) the plan includes activities for which there is no institutional need during the academic year covered by the plan; b) the plan includes activities for which the demand exceeds supply; or c) there is an institutional need for a professional activity that an insufficient number of faculty have included in their plans.

CAN a plan be modified once the academic year starts?

Yes, plans can be modified if the dean and faculty member mutually agree to do so.

CAN instructional faculty decide to do more than 7 points over the course of a year?

Generally, no. Voluntary additional service in excess of 7 points for instructional faculty / 5 for counselors / 4 for librarians does not result in additional compensation. (See next question for a complete answer.)

CAN deans force instructional faculty to do more than 7 points?

If the faculty member is required to exceed 7 points by the Dean, the faculty member may appeal to the workload pilot review committee; or agree to go over 7 points and be compensated for the additional service at the special rate for the actual hours spent; or (only in the first year of the pilot) opt to receive credit for the following year. For counselors use 5 points and for librarians use 4 points.

WHAT is the difference between professional responsibilities (non-teaching workload) and professional development, such as attending Flex days?

Professional development is not the type of activity that can be included in your professional workload plan, but these activities can be listed on your Flex form.

HOW do we determine points for standing committees that run during both spring and fall?

Committees that run for two semesters count once for the entire academic year. (Ex: 3 points for the entire year)

CAN I count points for supervising individual students doing research projects, such as working with Honors students?

Supervising Independent Study is capped at one student per academic year unless it is requested by the Dean. However, there is no provision in the pilot for working with Honors students. You can try checking with your Dean or appealing to the review committee.

WHAT is the definition of what it means to “serve as department lead?”

By definition, if you are the only full-timer in your discipline, you are the department lead – unless you have reassigned time for certain departmental duties – in which case you can only claim points for the duties that are not included in your reassigned time. There is no single definition of what it means to “serve as department lead” because this term is often discipline-specific.

CAN we choose to carry over points to the following year or bank points?

Only in the first year of the pilot – unless we negotiate a continuation of the program in the future that allows for carrying over points after the first year.

WHAT happens if you are under points? Are there penalties?

The contract applies to all faculty, and all faculty must participate in the pilot program. By June 15, 2023, faculty must submit a professional responsibilities report showing the activities undertaken in 2022-2023 and their status/progress. The contract does not specify any penalties for not completing all points.

CAN we count points for pursuing a graduate program of study?

No, this is not an activity included in the workload pilot.

IF you receive reassigned time, can you list those activities on your plan?

No, reassigned time can’t be considered for workload points.

CAN we share our plans with other faculty in our departments or divisions?

Yes, this can be very helpful. Some faculty are already collaborating in this way.

May 2022 Advocate: Health & Safety Report

Health & Safety Update

As Covid cases increase, Chancellor to propose lifting District mask mandate

After a busy year of advocacy on behalf of students and employees, your campus Health and Safety Committees are wrapping up their final meetings of the semester this month.

In Spring, both Skyline and Cañada College committees voted unanimously to approve sending a strong recommendation to the District’s Safety Management Committee that union representation at their meetings is essential for transparency in decision making, improved communications about health and safety districtwide, and democratic participatory government processes. They argued that meeting behind closed doors without any faculty or staff present does not serve the interests of the students or employees they are tasked with protecting. The District Committee will receive these recommendations at their June 6 meeting.

Notably, previous recommendations by the local campus committees to the District committee have resulted in few changes to campus health and safety functions. For background, see long time Skyline faculty member Rosemary Bell’s February 2022 opinion article, ‘Students first’ should mean strong, clear health & safety policies and transparency from administration.’

Covid cases on the rise in our District

Meanwhile, this Spring our District saw positive Covid exposures on the rise with four times as many students and employees testing positive in April than in March. May exposure numbers in SMCCCD have continued to reflect a clearly upward trend, mirrored by this graph of San Mateo County Covid cases from May 17, showing a significant uptick in cases since mid-March                                     (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2021/us/covid-cases-deaths-tracker.html)

Meanwhile, the District’s Covid health officer has continued to play down SMCCCD’s positive exposure statistics, reporting more friendly national statistics that ignore that California is currently a Covid “hotspot” and stressing the “endemic” nature of the virus. Throughout the academic year, Health and Safety committee members have advocated for greater transparency and improved communications about the situation faced by students and employees teaching and learning on campus.

Equity in the Face of “Emergency”

Despite a strong request by Skyline’s AFT representatives to convene Safety committee meetings this summer in order to proactively prepare for a safe Fall reopening, when the number of students and employees on campus is expected to increase substantially, the Committee Chair decided against this measure. Therefore, Committee meetings will cease during Summer. For example, if masking requirements are dropped by the Board of Trustees during the Summer term, some employees will need weeks or months to work with their Deans and HR to obtain work-from-home accommodations in time for the Fall semester, especially as Fall classes have already been assigned. However, without any support or advocacy during summer health and safety meetings, will the District be proactive in communicating policy changes and responding to employee requests for accommodations in a timely way?

It’s hoped that with new equity language unanimously adopted into Skyline’s new committee bylaws just this month, administrators will begin to recognize that our students and employees experience health and safety “emergencies” differently. A host of factors play into how Covid affects us including, of course, our ages as well as our ethnicity, orientation, underlying health conditions, insurance, socioeconomic status, immigration status, ability and more. The newly enacted bylaws now “support an equitable approach to Health, Safety, and Emergency Preparedness in accordance with Skyline’s mission, vision, and values; and anti-racism and social justice statements.”

Covid PCR Testing on Campus

At Skyline’s May 2022 Health and Safety meeting, CSEA and AFT representatives asked VPSS Dr. Orante to explain how several students exempted from vaccination for medical and/or religious reasons had been able to continue attending classes in person and using campus services while failing to check in for weekly covid PRC testing on campus. How did compliance fall through the cracks? Questions remain.

Committee reps also noted that the District’s contracted Covid testing vendor “Covid Clinic” providing testing on our campuses (distinct from SM County testing provided at CSM) continues to require that a level of personal information be provided that’s likely to discourage our District’s hundreds of undocumented students and employees from getting tested onsite. The testing registration form requests: social security number, passport or driver’s license number, home address, and insurance carrier. The Covid health officer has agreed to look into this, but this begs the question: how did these details slip through the cracks when our campuses have repeatedly promised a “students first” inclusive and equitable college experience?

Chancellor to propose changes to District mask mandate

At its April 27 Board of Trustees meeting it was announced that SMCCCD will begin to consider lifting the mask mandate now that Covid is “endemic,” and plans to consult all constituents for feedback. AFT’s Spring 2022 Member Survey on Masking showed that as many as “16.74% of faculty survey respondents would require a [work from home] accommodation if the District dropped the mask requirement for unvaccinated employees and students during Spring.” On Monday, May 16, Chancellor Claire announced in an all-district e-mail that he will be “recommending a change that makes indoor masking an individual and personal decision when San Mateo County is designated by the CDC as green or yellow in terms of COVID risk, and mandatory when San Mateo County is designated as red,” adding that he would “be taking this recommendation to the Board at the May 25 Board meeting. He lastly asked that all faculty and staff complete a district survey on individuals’ preferences regarding district masking requirements. We encourage all faculty, especially those who have particular concerns, to complete the survey by clicking here.

AFT is also conducting a separate survey to gather faculty feedback on the changes proposed by Chancellor Claire, as well as various potential masking policies. We plan to present an overview of the feedback as well as reading particular comments (with your consent) at the May 25th Board meeting. You can take the survey by clicking here. (https://bit.ly/AFTmasksurvey.) Please complete the survey by this Tuesday, May 24th, at 11:59 p.m. You have the option to take the survey anonymously or to have your name attached to your comments.

We also encourage those who are concerned about the district’s masking requirements to express their opinions and/or share personal experiences during public comments at the May 25th Board meeting at 6 p.m.

Some good news…

Importantly, a request by your AFT safety reps for renewed CPR training – on hiatus for years – did result in a well attended, day long training session during April 2022 Flex day with renewed, extensive training planned next year for all Building Captains.

What else can faculty do?

AFT encourages you to attend your final Safety Committee meeting of the year on your campus by Zoom. These meetings are open to all.  You can also contact your reps ahead of the meeting with any concerns you’d like shared on your behalf.

Lastly, please consider sharing any input you may have, especially with regard to masking, at your final Academic Senate meetings of the year. Again, you can also speak out during public comments at the Board of Trustees’ May 25 meeting at 6 pm about whatever concerns you have. For more information about how to do this, touch base with Marianne Kaletzky, AFT1493’s Executive Secretary <Kaletzky@aft1493.org>. Your union continues to work diligently to support you during this continuing health crisis.

May 2022 Advocate: CFT Voter Guide

Election Recommendations

CFT’s Voter Guide provides recommendations for June primary

Ballots have been sent out to voters across California for the June 7, 2022 primary election, and the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) encourages faculty to support candidates and measures that support our schools and California’s working families.

Before you vote, please take a moment to review CFT’s Educators Choice Voter Guide. The guide contains voting recommendations for both statewide and local candidates and measures that will appear on your ballot.

Please check out our Educators Choice Voter Guide, review the records of the candidates for yourself, and remember to cast your ballot!

If you live in Assembly District 21, which covers San Mateo County east of 280, stretching from South San Francisco to East Palo Alto, AFT 1493 recommends James Coleman for Assembly. Read the Advocate’s in-depth interview with James:

May 2022 Advocate: CFT organizing for “Equity for Contingent Faculty”

Adjunct faculty rights

AFT 1493 reps attend CFT’s conference
and lobby day supporting “Equity for Contingent Faculty”

by Jessica Silver-Sharp, AFT 1493 Secretary

During the 1st and 2nd of May, AFT1493 members hit the road to Sacramento to represent our local at the first-ever CFT conference and lobby day on the topic “Equity for Contingent Faculty.” The SMCCD group, which included local president Monica Malamud and Skyline faculty members Rika Yonemura-Fabian, Kolo Wamba, Timothy Rottenberg, Sue Broxholm, and Jessica Silver-Sharp as well as Executive Secretary, Marianne Kaletzky, was able to participate in many ways.

Sue Broxholm, Marianne Kaletzky, Timothy Rottenberg, and Jessica Silver-Sharp at CFT’s “Equity for Contingent Faculty” conference

The first day was for organizing workshops. Rika and Kolo represented our Anti-Oppression Committee (AOC) with a workshop on how local unions can champion diversity, equity and inclusion by organizing for improvements in, for example, how SMCCD implements Title IX. They described their work to involve members in demanding change from our administration while also stressing part-time faculty’s systematic marginalization within the broader social and economic context. (It’s not too late to sign AFT’s petition for gender justice, which has prompted the District to begin revisiting administrative procedures for Title IX; read more here).

Lobby Day

On day 2, lobby day, we split into small groups, did some role-playing work, and then made visits to the offices of California’s assembly members and their staff including Kevin Mullen, Scott Wiener, Bill Dodd, and Thomas Umberg. The goal? First, to secure their support for Governor Newsom’s January state budget proposal to increase the Part-Time Faculty Health Insurance Fund by $200 million; second, to secure their support for bills AB1752 (Santiago, D-Los Angeles) and AB1856 (Medina, D-Riverside).

Marianne Kaletzky (left) with Senator Bill Dodd (right) at CFT’s Lobby Day

AB1752 would create pay parity for part-timers by requiring districts to adopt terms of compensation of at least the same ratio to full-time faculty for comparable duties, while AB1856 would increase the teaching cap for part-time faculty from 67% (the “67% law”) in a single district to up to 85% of full time in one district. Part-time faculty made their arguments to representatives with personal examples of the pitfalls of working without adequate health care and having to drive hundreds of miles per week between different districts due to the 67% cutoff. Lobby day was organized by CFT’s lobbyist Michael Young, which was no small feat with many faculty unable to attend at the last minute due to Covid.

The Conference also called attention to CFT’s Survey of Part-Time faculty, published May 1 (“Statewide survey results call out healthcare crisis among part-time faculty in community colleges”), which we encourage you to read.

During the conference we met AFT student interns from other districts (this year our local provided internships to students Cat Stoehr and Shannon Hoang) and made plans to connect our future interns for fun and collaboration.

Throughout the conference we heard from CFT President Jeffery Freitas, who emphasized CFT’s commitment to ending the two-tier system that creates an underclass of adjuncts with worse compensation, benefits, and job security than permanent faculty, and networked with other local AFT organizers and faculty.  If you have questions about the conference or these pending bills, contact Marianne Kaletzky <kaletzky@aft1493.org>.

 

May 2022 Advocate: AFT Summer Book Club

Union Book Club

Join AFT 1493’s Summer Book Club

Unions are on the rise! But do you know the backstory? This summer faculty, staff and students are invited to join a virtual Book Club reading Fred Glass’s award-winning labor history, From Mission to Microchip: A History of the California Labor Movement, University of California Press (2016).

Professor Glass is an instructor in City College of San Francisco’s Labor Studies program and formerly was Communications Director of the CFT and served as AFT1493’s Executive Secretary; he also authored A History of the California Federation of Teachers, 1919-1989.

The Book Club will be facilitated by Evan Kaiser, AFT rep and ESL Professor at CSM. There will be no homework beyond reading. The Club will meet four times during Summer.

Interested in joining? Please fill out this poll to let us know your availability:

https://doodle.com/meeting/participate/id/dL9plpWe

Meeting dates, times and Zoom link will be announced in early June. More information, including how to get a copy of the book, is also available here: https://bit.ly/MissiontoMicrochip 

Questions? Contact Evan Kaiser <kaiser@aft1493.org> or Jessica Silver-Sharp <silver-sharp@aft1493.org>