Monthly Archives: March 2022

March-April 2022 Advocate: What does it mean to be an anti-racist union?

Anti-Racist Unionism

What does it mean to be an anti-racist union? Reviewing the history of racism and anti-racism in organized labor

by David Lau, AFT 1493 CSM Chapter Chair

At the February AFT 1493 membership meeting, local members held a discussion about the history of organized labor and race in the United States and what it means to be an anti-racist union. Cañada College Chapter Chair Michael Hoffman led the discussion by summarizing a number of issues presented in historian Philip Foner’s classic book Organized Labor and the Black Worker: 1619-1973. While the book contains many historical lessons, Michael brought out some specific aspects in the text.

Foner depicts a complex relationship between organized labor and Black workers, one with several variables. Foner’s text focuses on the struggle within organized labor over how to approach the racial divisions created in the U.S. since the end of emancipation. Racist exclusion—what Mike Davis, writing in Prisoners of the American Dream, calls “the unifying theme” in U.S. labor history—is carefully presented by Foner as a fundamental tool used by employers to weaken labor struggles.

Labor leaders could accept racism or fight against it to unite workers against management

The struggle within organized labor’s leadership took shape around two major tendencies: one that acquiesced to racism and accepted white-supremacist attitudes as insurmountable, and another that actively fought against racist ideas in order to unite workers into a common struggle. As an illustration of these two tendencies, Michael provided two striking passages from Foner:

  1. When asked why he was not as hard on local unions that were known to discriminate against black workers due to their race as he was on those unions who were found to be corrupt, then President of the AFL-CIO George Meany said in 1961:
    “I do not equate problems of racial discrimination with the problems of corruption any more than I equate Hungary with Little Rock.”
  1. On the other side of the spectrum, the CIO Committee to Abolish Discrimination produced a 1942 pamphlet educating union members about the need to work against racist divisions:
    “The position of the union in this respect must be firmly taken … separation or segregation of workers in any form is undemocratic and unnecessary. If segregation is tolerated by the union in one manner it can be practiced by management without respect for the union’s wishes in other matters.”

Positive examples of anti-racist unionism

Michael also emphasized how Foner depicts the rich history of anti-racist labor struggle which struck powerful blows to white supremacist ideas and policies. When organizations like the United Mine Workers, the Industrial Workers of the World, and the Knights of Labor took up broad solidarity between Black workers, native-born workers, and immigrants, they often had successes. Friedrich Engels thought the Knights of Labor, with its pioneering attempts to organize Black and women workers, signaled the birth of working-class mass politics in the United States. Foner, for his part, calls the 1930s-era Congress of Industrial Unions (CIO) “the most important single development since the Civil War in the Black worker’s struggle for equality.”

Foner lays out the historical connection between anti-union and white racist politics. The same kind of mob violence that was used to terrorize Black people in the south, was also deployed against the labor movement in concert with employers.  The principled radicals—many of whom were Communist Party USA members in the 1920s, 30s and 40s—who were instrumental in the most successful anti-racist union practices in the CIO were all purged during the long period of McCarthyism and anti-communism after the Second World War. Foner highlights the ways in which anti-communism became another tool used to weaken both the labor and the civil rights movements, ushering in a decline in US labor’s power in the decades following the 1970s.

Today’s smaller, more diverse labor movement is more committed to anti-racist organizing

Michael concluded by noting how important it is for the labor movement to adopt an anti-racist practice of inclusion and open discussion of race and racism. He emphasized that the greatest gains in the labor movement involved active, deliberate anti-racism grounded in the principle of solidarity between all workers. I noted in the meeting how the much smaller labor movement today is strikingly diverse. Concentrated in the public sector unions like ours, union activists tend to be multicultural and commonly dedicate themselves to equality and justice for oppressed groups. While we are much smaller and largely uprooted from the private sector compared to the times analyzed by Foner, our labor movement now has strength in solidarity. We also benefit from complex historical criticisms of our national labor movement, like those presented by Michael in his analysis of Philip Foner’s book. It’s essential for the labor movement in general, and for local unions–like our own–to continue to do the essential work of building anti-racist organizations and movements.

Would you like to join a labor history reading group this summer? If so, please contact AFT CSM Executive Committee Co-Rep. Evan Kaiser at kaiser@aft1493.org.

Recommended Reading:

March-April 2022 (Issue 45, Number 5)

In this issue:

March-April 2022 Advocate: CFT passes resolution to end two-tier wage system

Adjunct faculty equity

CFT passes resolution to develop a strategy to end the two-tier system in California community colleges

At the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) State Council meeting in San Francisco on Saturday, March 19, the body unanimously passed a resolution to “Develop a Strategic Plan to End the Two-Tier System” in California Community Colleges in which adjunct faculty have lower pay and benefits, less secure positions and less privileged working conditions compared to full-time faculty. The proposal was submitted by the CFT Part-Time Faculty Committee and Higher Education Issues Committee.  John Govsky, Co-Chair of the CFT Part-Time Committee, and a part-time instructor at Cabrillo College for over 20 years, provides a brief background on the resolution below.

In 1978, the California Community Colleges Board of Governors approved the principle of limiting part-time faculty teaching to 25% of credit instruction. Ten years later AB 1725, authored by John Vasconcellos, codified the goal of “75/25” to “address longstanding policy of the board of governors that at least 75 percent of the hours of credit instruction in the California Community Colleges, as a system, should be taught by full-time instructors.”

So the issue of over-reliance on part-time faculty has existed for decades, as has the goal of 75/25. We’ve seen 40 years of advocacy for 75/25: senate and union resolutions, bills, lobbying on funding for full-time positions, and other measures. Yet, as a system, there has been zero progress toward achieving this goal.

At the very least, we should look critically at our failure here. But this resolution proposes that we should go further, and re-think this goal itself. After all, 75/25 is a completely arbitrary figure; there is no research indicating that this is the optimum ratio for our students or for our system. Maybe a better goal would be 90/10? Given the seemingly intractable nature of the problem, this proposal shifts the focus to moving toward a one-tier system, rather than continuing the failed strategy of aiming at 75/25.

Two-tier systems are notoriously anti-labor, and CFT already has the stated goal of “ending of the two-tiered wage system” in our community colleges. Even if we could get to 75/25, adding more teachers into the upper tier means having fewer exploited workers, and this is not a bad thing. Lowering the amount of exploitation is preferable to what we have now, but is this really the best long-term vision for the future? A better goal would be having no exploited workers at all.

Hence the resolution to come up with a plan to address this. The resolution calls on CFT to create a task force to develop a long-term plan to transition from the current two-tier system into a one-tier system. Such systems in higher ed, such as the “Vancouver Model,” already exist. We can learn from what’s been done in this area and build our own vision.

We have heard that the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result. It’s time to acknowledge our failure, re-examine our strategy, articulate a vision, and figure out how to get there.

View the full resolution as passed

 

March-April 2022 Advocate: Results of faculty mask requirement survey

AFT 1493 Faculty Survey on District Mask Requirement

Survey finds 50% of faculty comfortable with continuing mask requirement, 50% comfortable with ending it

Although masking requirements put in place by the California Department of Public Health and Cal/OSHA have changed, SMCCCD currently continues to require all individuals on campuses to wear masks indoors.  If this requirement were rescinded, however, the new CDPH and Cal/OSHA guidance would allow both employees and students, regardless of vaccination status, to go unmasked in campus buildings.

To understand faculty perspectives on potential changes to masking policies, especially as we look at the possibility of negotiating with the District over masking requirements, AFT 1493 asked district faculty to take a 2-question online survey during the first week of March.  466 faculty (a little more than half of all district faculty) responded to the survey.

Should the district continue to require masks or not?

The first question asked faculty members: “Which of the following masking policies would you feel comfortable with?” Three answer choices were provided and respondents could select more than one choice. A total of about 50% of faculty said they were comfortable with a policy that required masking for all for the remainder of the Spring 2022 semester. 50% also said they were comfortable with a policy that allowed everyone to choose whether to wear a mask. Around 15% of respondents would be OK with a policy that would only require unvaccinated people to wear masks on campus for the rest of the semester. Below are more details: 

  • I am comfortable with an SMCCCD policy that requires employees, students, and visitors to wear masks for the remainder of the Spring 2022 semester, regardless of their vaccination status.  230 (49.68%)
  • I am comfortable with an SMCCCD policy that requires unvaccinated employees, students, and visitors to wear masks for the remainder of the Spring 2022 semester but allows vaccinated employees, students, and visitors not to wear masks if they choose.  68 (14.69%)
  • I am comfortable with a policy that allows all employees, students, and visitors, regardless of vaccination status, not to wear masks if they choose.  234 (50.54%)

Percentages total more than 100% because faculty could choose more than one option. 32 faculty said they would be comfortable with either a policy that required everyone to wear masks or a policy that did not require anyone to wear them (meaning that in either case there would be no restrictions specific to vaccination status). 19 faculty said they would be comfortable with a policy that required everyone to wear masks or one that required only unvaccinated people to wear them. 8 faculty said they would be comfortable with a policy that required only unvaccinated people to wear masks or did not require anyone to wear them. 5 faculty said they were comfortable with any of the three options, while 3 faculty did not check any option.

174 faculty said they were only comfortable with a policy that requires everyone to wear a mask. 189 faculty said they were only comfortable with a policy that allows everyone to choose not to wear a mask. 36 faculty said they were only comfortable with a policy that requires unvaccinated people to wear a mask while allowing vaccinated people to choose whether to wear a mask.

If the district dropped mask requirements, how many faculty would require an accommodation?

The second question asked faculty respondents: “If the District dropped some mask requirements, would you require an accommodation based on your health conditions? Possible accommodations include continuing the mask requirement in your office or classroom, or a remote work arrangement.” Two answer choices were provided and respondents could select either, both or none. Below are the answer choices and the numbers of respondents who selected each:

  • I would require an accommodation if the District dropped the mask requirement for unvaccinated employees and students.  78 (16.74%)
  • I would require an accommodation if the District dropped the mask requirement for vaccinated employees and students45 (9.66%)

AFT will continue to advocate for robust and diverse Covid safety measures and for the continued availability of N95 and KN-95 masks furnished by the District for employees and students.

 

A sampling of the 127 individual comments from faculty respondents:

I think a slow but steady removal of mask-wearing is appropriate in the classroom and indoor setting, assuming Covid does not get worse during the year. During these unstable times, we can provide consistent and clear messaging to employees and students that masks will continue to be required through the spring semester. The smaller in-person summer session would be an ideal time to “test” an optional mask policy for the campus.

Let’s follow the CDC guidelines here. We have to trust scientists to do their job.

Although I am excited to say good-bye to the mask, I think some of my students would feel very uneasy about being in a relatively crowded space with unmasked people. This is not what they initially signed up for, and I can anticipate that a few of them would consider dropping the classes.

People who need extra safety or protection can teach from home, work from home, or wear as many masks as they want. They do not have the right to force the rest of the world to wear masks…There is absolutely no science backing the decision to mandate mask wearing at this point. Covid is an endemic condition now.

While dropping the mask mandate does not mean I am personally affected due to my health conditions, it may affect my immunocompromised loved ones who I would have to restrict contact with. Also, if we continued the mask mandate, which I am in favor of, better signage would be needed – as students are already not wearing masks inside buildings. I do not want to have to police students walking down the hallways to wear their masks.

I think it’s time for the district to drop all mandates for masks and vaccines. I am ashamed to work for an institution that actively and systemically discriminates against entire groups of people, disproportionately people of color. SMCCD should be open to ALL. 

Many employees returned to campus and signed contracts with the understanding that masking would be required. For the district to change their policy mid semester would be unfair to employees who agreed to an assignment trusting that all would be masked indoors.

Masks reduce the flow of oxygen to the brain. That is an undisputed fact. [Ed. note: See this fact check that disputes this claim. This harms the wearer and reduces one’s capacity for cognition. Masks create significant negative psychological harm, as it socially alienates both the wearer and the observer. Masks create an internal environment in the nose, throat and lungs that encourages the proliferation of harmful bacteria.

It still feels too early to tell if unmasking indoors is a good idea. I have had quite a few students miss class recently because of contracting or being exposed to COVID-19. By April(after Spring break), things might look better. 

I am very concerned for the possibility of masking no longer being required. It puts to many people at risk of illness and missing work. I think masks should stay for the remainder of the semester.

I am so done with the masking business! Please, please, please let me free my face. I have a fairly large nose and I am tired of having it smashed all day, every day.

 

 

 

March-April 2022 Advocate: New contract campaign launched

Contract Campaign

Our Contract Action Team (CAT) is growing!  Faculty point people help activate members to win the contract we deserve!

By Katharine Harer & Rika Fabian, CAT Co-Chairs

Bargaining for a new multi-year contract is about to begin. (Click here to read the article describing our contract proposals.) Our Contract Action Team (CAT) has launched a new effort to build faculty power, asking leaders in every department across the three colleges to take on the role of CAT “point people.” Their task: to inform and engage 10 or so of their colleagues throughout the campaign. A great group of faculty has signed on to help, representing a wide array of departments. But we can still use more CATs!  Please let us know if you’d like to help.

Please complete a “Count On Me” card

At a planning meeting in early March, we developed a plan for the campaign kick-off. Starting on March 14, CATs are asking 10 or so of their colleagues to fill out “Count On Me” cards. The cards are digital as well as on paper – bright green for springing into action! The cards list our contract proposals on one side and a checklist of actions members can commit to taking part in on the other side. If you’re asked by a colleague to fill out a Count On Me card, please do it. You can also complete one right now by going to this link: https://bit.ly/3J1VjjG Completing a card takes less than 5 minutes, and every Count On Me card gives us valuable information about faculty priorities and our strength to take collective actions.

 

“Week of Action”– 4/18 – 4/23

In April, we’re planning a “Week of Action”– 4/18 – 4/23. We’ll have an informational rally on our contract demands, tabling to hear from faculty and a workshop at the April 21st Flex Day to help you “Know Your Contract.” In early May we’re planning a Teach In, focusing on funding issues for education and connections to social justice and equity – for students, staff and faculty. Members are signing up to serve on Action Planning Teams for the Week of Action and the Teach In.  We can always use more help, so please let us know if you’d like to serve on one of these teams by emailing Marianne Kaletzky at kaletzky@aft1493.org.

Join us at a CAT meeting

CAT will begin meeting again regularly on the second and fourth Fridays of every month from 2:00-3:30pm. Our first meeting of the new campaign is on Friday March 25th from 2:00-3:30 at this Zoom link: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/7052173089. CAT meetings are where, as a group, we hammer out contract campaign strategies and get updates from our negotiators. Faculty from all three colleges, full and part-time, and from every department and job designation across the district have attended CAT meetings in the past. It’s a powerful way to collaborate with colleagues. Please join us when you can. Everyone is welcome!

CATs with cards are coming your way! Look out for CATs in your department with bright green cards in their hands or sent to you over the æther, and please fill them out. That’s when you’ll hear CATs purr!