
San Mateo
Minutes of
General Membership/Executive Committee Meeting
April 9, 2008 - Cañada College
Present: Eric
Brenner, Alma Cervantes, Chip Chandler, Victoria Clinton, Teeka James, Dan
Kaplan, John Kirk, Yaping Li, Monica Malamud, Karen Olesen, Ernie Rodriguez,
Anne Stafford, Elizabeth Terzakis
Guests: Patty Dilko,
Jane Hetrick, Richard Holober, Eugenia Lan, Martin Partlan, Richael Young
Meeting began at 2:25
Facilitator: Monica Malamud
Ernie began by stressing that AFT wants our discussions with
the Board to be ongoing and reiterated the suggestion that we organize some
sort of retreat, separate from our EC meetings, to continue the discussions
begun this semester.
Ø Accreditation:
Richard said he does see Cañada’s and
CSM’s warning status as a crisis and pointed out that Cañada’s team actually
did recommend full accreditation. Richael expressed confidence that the two
colleges will get off warning status, but stressed the importance of the District’s
strategic plan matching the colleges Education Master Plans.
Ø Administrative
salary increases: While Richard feels that the timing of the salary
increases was terrible, he pointed out that the Chancellor had wanted the
increase for a long time. He stressed that while he doesn’t always agree with
the Chancellor, he supports him completely.
Ø AFT’s
relationship with the Board: Richard said
that while there is a range of opinions among Board members, in general they
feel that AFT is fundamentally hostile to the Chancellor and that it has
sabotaged the Board through The Advocate and other media. He
believes that any existing ill will and/or distrust have been solidified in
recent months.
EC members expressed what we
perceive to be a lack of respect for faculty on the part of the Board; it feels
as if the Board expects us to support the Chancellor unconditionally and does
not give us credit for the support we have shown. Many of us are still
concerned that requests that we use The Advocate for more “positive” ends, and that we call a temporary “cease fire” are
inappropriate and show a fundamental lack of understanding regarding the role
of the union. The notion of a “cease fire” implies a state of war, a
condition which AFT and the Administration are not in.
The EC expressed its concern that
important information doesn’t always get to the
Board because it is first filtered through Administration. And, of course,
Board members
have no way of knowing that anything is missing. In a related vein, Richael
pointed out that issues often get to the Board too late, presented as “time sensitive,”
resulting in the violation of appropriate processes.
Ø Suggested
future steps:
Approved
There have been four meetings to date. Summary (from
Joaquin’s report) included below; please go to AFT website for more
information.
A. Grievances
Ø District
has agreed to increase number of days to file grievance at level I from 20 to
30.
Ø District
has agreed to suggestion on 17.4.1 to schedule a hearing within 10 days of
appeal date.
Ø District
has refused binding arbitration.
Ø District
has refused to change 17.5.5 to allow amendment of grievance before
arbitration.
B. Part-Time
Issues
Ø Despite
a good deal of discussion, District has not provided a substantive counter
proposal yet.
C. Distance
Education
Ø District
has not given a counter proposal yet.
AFT 1493 has donated $5,000 already. The EC voted to
recommend that COPE contribute an additional $2,200 (for a maximum allowed
contribution of $7,200). There was one “no” vote.
John reported that there are currently five formal
grievances on file, more than at any one time in the past.
Ø One
second-year faculty member met with John and has decided not to file a
grievance.
Ø The
other second-year faculty member has had a Level 1 hearing. The college
president (Mike Claire) did not meet the deadline for responding to the grievance.
AFT has appealed to the Chancellor and will be meeting with him tomorrow
(4/10/08).
Ø AFT
met with the college president last Friday (4/4/08) regarding the grievance for
the fourth-year faculty member.
Ernie, Dan, and Anne met with Mike Claire to emphasize, in
person, AFT’s need for additional office space. Nothing was resolved; another
meeting will be scheduled in the near future.
Ø Nominations:
Nomination forms for AFT leadership positions will be distributed around April
18.
Ø Release
time allocation: AFT 1493 provides slightly more release time than many
other locals. Dan suggested that in the future we may try to negotiate to buy
more (currently, the District provides 24 units per semester of reassigned time
and AFT can buy an additional 9 units per semester). For now, the EC voted
unanimously to adopt the proposed allocation for 2008-2009, the primary changes
being that the Secretary will receive a stipend in lieu of 1 unit of reassigned
time and the reassigned time for grievance work will increase from 3 units to
6, the specific distribution of which will be worked out later.
Alma agreed to serve as the AFT representative to DEAC.
Monica announced that Cañada cancelled all classes on
Friday, March 3/28 to allow faculty to participate in ongoing SLO work. 50 FT
faculty and 77 PT faculty (all of whom were paid to attend) participated. In
just that one day the college increased the percentage of courses with
completed SLO’s from 19% to 53%. Monica proposed that we change the contract
language to allow for PT faculty to paid for Flex activities conducted on days
they are not scheduled to teach.
Meeting adjourned: 4:50